Documented-Policy tier only. This score rates how clearly ShipFast's public cancellation page is published (cited, dated) — opinion grounded in disclosed facts, not a finding about the real cancel experience, and not legal advice. The behavioural Verified-Flow grade is pending.

67/ 100 · C

Developer tools · SG

How hard is it to cancel ShipFast?

ShipFast scores 67/100 (grade C) for how clearly it documents cancellation in the SG — a partially documented cancellation policy with notable gaps. Cancellation is available via online (self-serve).

Last reviewed 2026-06-14 · Documented-Policy tier · grade C

Model note: ShipFast (Marc Lou's Next.js boilerplate) is a ONE-TIME / lifetime purchase ($199–$299, 'Pay once. Build unlimited projects'), explicitly 'exempting users from recurring fees or subscriptions.' Because there is no recurring subscription, there is no cancellation trap — the lowest-friction model on the index — so the cancellation dimensions reflect 'nothing to escape' rather than a documented flow. The one genuine consumer term is the refund stance, which is clearly disclosed: 'the ShipFast boilerplate cannot be refunded or exchanged once access is granted' (access = a permanent GitHub repo invite). There is no dedicated refund page (terms in /tos) and governing law is Singapore. Graded for completeness at the operator's request; cancellation friction is largely not applicable to a one-time product.

How to cancel ShipFast

  • Channels: online (self-serve)
  • Official cancellation page: https://shipfa.st/tos
  • Pause/freeze: not offered. Not applicable — one-time purchase. ShipFast is a pay-once/lifetime boilerplate ('exempting users from recurring fees or subscriptions'); there is no recurring subscription to pause or cancel.
  • Refund policy: https://shipfa.st/tos
  • Account/data deletion: Access is via a perpetual GitHub repo invite; no recurring account/billing to delete. Governed by the Terms. https://shipfa.st/tos

Evidence

Scope & fairness

This is the Documented-Policy tier: it measures how clearly the cancellation policy is published (cited, dated facts), not the behavioural experience of cancelling (Verified-Flow audit pending). Every company is scored on the same five dimensions with the same published weights — scores cannot be bought or removed. It is opinion grounded in disclosed facts, and not legal advice.

Is this wrong? Companies can request a correction ->

Cite this. Cancel Atlas (2026). “ShipFast — Cancellation Friction Index (SG).” CES-1.1. https://www.cancelatlas.com/c/shipfast (CC BY-SA 4.0).

See ShipFast in the full index -> · How we score · Open data